INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

Освещение новых идей, вопросов науки и техники, последних разработок и исследований для специалистов широкого круга

PERFORMANCE STUDY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF YOLO-NAS AND PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF YOLO

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54309/IJICT.2024.17.1.006

Keywords:

YOLO-NAS, YOLO, обнаружение объектов, нейросетевая модель, компьютерное зрение, искусственный интеллект

Abstract

This study is devoted to analyzing the performance of the YOLO-NAS (You Only Look Once - Neural Architecture Search) object detection algorithm in comparison with its predecessors from the YOLO family. The aim of the work is to evaluate the performance of YOLO-NAS and to identify its advantages and disadvantages compared to previous versions of the YOLO algorithm. The study is conducted in several key performance aspects, including image processing speed, object detection accuracy, and computational resource utilization efficiency. To achieve these goals, we utilize standard datasets for training and testing object detection algorithms. The research methodology includes the development of an experimental platform that allows us to benchmark the performance of YOLO-NAS and previous versions of YOLO under identical conditions. Experiments are conducted on different hardware and software configurations to evaluate the adaptability of the algorithms to different operating conditions. The results of the study allow us to draw conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of YOLO-NAS compared to previous versions of YOLO in the context of performance. These conclusions can be useful for computer vision developers and researchers when choosing the most appropriate algorithm for their tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

Maratuly, A., & Abibullayev Е. (2024). PERFORMANCE STUDY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF YOLO-NAS AND PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF YOLO. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, 5(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.54309/IJICT.2024.17.1.006
Loading...