PHYSICS-INFORMED HYBRID LEARNING FOR HOURLY POWER-PLANT EMISSIONS: A MULTI-POLLUTANT BENCHMARK WITH UNCERTAINTY AND TRANSFER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54309/IJICT.2026.27.3.008Keywords:
emission monitoring; predictive emission monitoring system; physics-informed machine learning; uncertainty quantification; plant-level transfer; continuous emission monitoring systems; carbon neutralityAbstract
This study examines whether the same modelling strategy can be used for hourly CO₂, NOx, and SO₂ emission estimation at power plants, or whether the choice of model should depend on the pollutant and deployment setting. We assembled 10,144,680 unit-hours from 583 generating units in Georgia, Kentucky, and Texas for 2022 and 2024 by combining U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Program Data with EIA-860 plant metadata through the EPA/EIA Power Sector Crosswalk. Emission-factor, statistical, machine-learning, and physics-informed hybrid models were tested using blocked-time, plant-holdout, and seasonal-holdout splits to limit temporal and unit-level leakage. PHASE, the proposed hybrid, uses a scaled emission-factor estimate as a physical prior and learns the remaining residual with a data-driven model while also estimating predictive uncertainty. The results differ sharply by pollutant. For CO₂, the emission-factor baseline already explained most of the variance (R² = 0.992), whereas its performance was much weaker for NOx (R² = 0.394) and SO₂ (R² = 0.413). XGBoost reached R² = 0.999, 0.973, and 0.980 for CO₂, NOx, and SO₂, respectively. For NOx, removing recent historical features caused the largest deterioration in accuracy, while removing the simple physical prior slightly improved average in-domain MAE. At the same time, PHASE-lite reduced some large-error episodes according to the Diebold-Mariano comparison (p < 10⁻³), achieved 89.2% empirical coverage for a nominal 90% interval, and retained R² = 0.965 on previously unseen plants. The evidence therefore supports a differentiated strategy: a transparent factor model is already strong for CO₂, while NOx and SO₂ require learned representations of changing operating conditions. The hybrid is most useful when uncertainty, large-error robustness, and cross-plant transfer matter more than the lowest average in-domain error. A future corroborative comparison with Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO₂ observations over Kazakhstan thermal plants is also defined.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en